← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5088/2024dismissed

Vishnu Dev Bhandari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5088 of 2024 ====================================================== Vishnu Dev Bhandari Son of Deo Narayan Bhandari, Resident of VillageNondarhi, P.S.-Ladaniya District-Madhubani, Ex-Representative of Honble Member of Parliament Jhanjharpur Constituency. At Present, Vishnu Deo Bhandari, aged about 53 (M), S/o Deo Narayan Bhandai Main Post Office Madhubani, Post Box No.15, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar Patna. 2.

The Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar,, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department Govt. of Bihar Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary Scheme/Project Development Department Govt. of Bihar Patna.

5.

The District- Magistrate Madhubani.

6.

The Superintendent of Police Madhubani.

7.

The Executive Engineer Rural Works Department Work Division Jainnagar and Jhanjharpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) for direction to the respondent authorities to take appropriate legal steps against the erring officials for non-institution of first Informant Report against the guilty person who were indulged in defalcation of Public Money

Patna High Court CWJC No.5088 of 2024(2) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 allotted to them for completion of Hon'ble Member of Parliament area Development amount for different scheme in between 17.05.2004 to 18.05.2009."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U