← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18084/2020bail granted

Bikram Kumar Yadav @ Bikram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-10Mr. Justice S. Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18084 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2018 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== BIKRAM KUMAR YADAV @ BIKRAM YADAV S/o Jalo Yadav @ Arun Yadav @ Jaleshwar Yadav Resident of Village-Sotipur, P.S-Bariyarpur, District-Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-06-2020 The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has stated that on 11.10.2018 while he was returning to his branch after weekly collection, two unknown miscreants who had covered their face, on the strength of Arms, snatched the black coloured bag, containing Rs. 1,67,833/-, one Tab of Samsung company, one mobile and his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18084 of 2020(2) dt.10-06-2020 2/3 purse containing his Adhara Card, PAN Card, owner book of vehicle etc.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely Vivek Yadav @ Vikky Yadav. Petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18084 of 2020(2) dt.10-06-2020 3/3 proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veena U T