← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16959/2014disposed

Dharamraj Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16959 of 2014 ====================================================== Dharamraj Singh Yadav Son of Late Chandrama Yadav Resident of Village - Mansoorpur, P.O. - Kasthari, P.S. - Durgwati, District- Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. District Education Officer, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

3. Block Education Officer, Durgawati Block, District - Kaimur.

4. Teacher Selection Committee, Gram Panchayat, Chehariya through its Panchayat Secretary, Chehariya Gram Panchayat, Block - Durgawati, DistrictKaimur.

5. District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Kaimur at Bhabua through its Secretary.

6. Ramesh Singh Son of Sri Haribans Singh Resident of Village - mansoorpur, Post - Kasturi, P.s. - Durgawati, District- Kaimur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Ranjan, AC to GP-6.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed against the decision of District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Kaimur at Bhabua, contained an Annexure-2. He submits that now the State Appellate Authority is available against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal as Appellate forum and as such petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16959 of 2014(2) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, in case such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with copy of this order, the Appellate Authority will condone the delay in filing the appeal and entertain and decide expeditiously the same on its own merits in view of the pendency of the writ petition for last more than four years.

With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U