Ranjit Kumar Rai @ Ranjeet Kumar Roy @ Ranjit Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1795 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -410 Year- 2017 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Rai @ Ranjeet Kumar Roy @ Ranjit Roy, Son of Hira Nand Roy, resident of Village- Gorihare Chowk, Ward No. 19, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Jitendra Kr.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2017 in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 410 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the extra-judicial confessional statements of co-accused Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Yadav and Suraj Yadav who also named other accused persons namely Chandan Yadav and Anil Yadav. All the aforesaid accused persons have been granted bail by this Court.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 410 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1795 of 2018 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T