Sujeet Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33356 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2014 Thana -NAUHATTA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Sujeet Rai Son of Late Ram Narayan Rai
2. Krishna Mohan Rai Son of Satto Rai @ Satoo Rai
3. Satto Rai @ Sato Rai Son of Late Magan Rai
4. Bhujdeo Rai Son of Sato Rai
5. Mukesh Ra Son of Satto Rai @ Sato Rai
6. Ashok Rai Son of Late Ram Narayan Rai
7. Raushan Rai @ Raushan Son of Sato Rai All residents of Village - Sattor, Tola-Koyala Mani, Police Station-Nauhatta (Darhar O.P.), Dist.- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2016 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No. 4 Bhujdeo Rai has been arrested; hence his application has become infructuous. The petitioners have renewed their prayer for bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 354, 307, 452, 325, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that the F.I.R named accused persons and 10-15 unknown came to the house of the informant, made assault to the informant and others and took away box containing house hold articles.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33356 of 2015 (2) dt.10-02-2016 2/2 petitioners that except one injury for which opinion has been kept reserved, other injuries have been found to be simple in nature and there is counter version of the occurrence also when no one received injuries from the petitioners' side. Considering the above submissions, the application was disposed of with a direction to the learned Court below to consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if they surrender within a period of six weeks. This Court finds no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Let learned Court below considers the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, except petitioner No. 4, if they surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Nauhatta (Darhar O.P) P.S Case No. 37 of 2014, G.R. No. 684 of 2014.
Accordingly the application is disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T