← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6249/2025dismissed

Alok Mankar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-28Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6249 of 2025 ====================================================== Alok Mankar Son of Sri Anil Mankar, Resident of Village Tetia, P.S. Tetiya Bambar District Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., R-Block, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

5.

The Deputy General Manager (Adm.), Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., R-Block, Patna.

6.

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, BSFC, Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6 Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, AC to GP-6 Mr. Rana Veer Prawar, AC to GP-6 For the B.S.F.C.

:

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mrs. Shilpi Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner, Learned Counsel for the B.S.F.C. and Learned Counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing letter No.140 dated 26.04.2022 along with memo of charge issued by respondent No.2, by which departmental

Patna High Court CWJC No.6249 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 proceeding was proposed to be initiated against the petitioner.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the said memo of charge has not been issued by the competent authority.

4. Learned Counsel for the State submits that petitioner has every liberty to challenge the same before the Enquiry Officer or before the Competent Authority.

5. As such, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the letter. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same before the Enquiry Officer/Conducting Officer as and when situation shall arise.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U