Samar Kumar @ Ronit @ Ronit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31714 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -160 Year- 2016 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Samar Kumar @ Ronit @ Ronit Kumar, Son of Munna Yadav, Resident of village- Rautara, P.S.- Rautara, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt. Sahin Begam (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patori P.S Case No. 160 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught red-handed with looted amount of Rs. 45,000/- whereas another miscreants succeeded in fleeing away with motorcycle.
Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, his confessional statement has been recorded forcibly and his signature has been obtained on seizure list forcibly. The petitioner is suffering in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31714 of 2016 (3) dt.19-09-2016 2/2 custody without any fault since 01.05.2016, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he is involved in four more cases.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery and further considering his criminal antecedent at present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected, in connection with Patori P.S Case No. 160 of 2016 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within six months, failing which if the petitioner is at no fault he may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T