Bhola Yadav @ Bhola Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18693 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bhola Yadav @ Bhola Kumar Yadav Son of Sriram Yadav Resident of Village- Padminiya P.S.- Krishnagarh District -Bhojpur Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 495 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have killed the father of the informant. The informant believes that the petitioner along with others, has killed his father, as the son of the informant was having an affair with the daughter of Sriram Yadav.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18693 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the name of this petitioner is framed in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that from perusal of the FIR, there are altogether six assailants and from perusal of the postmortem report, it is clear that the deceased has received three gunshot injuries. He further submits that the learned trial court has rejected the bail of the petitioner only on the basis of suppression of antecedents. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.11.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18693 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 3/3 Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 495 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T