Anis Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25100 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2024 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Anis Khatoon W/o Shahidul Ansari @ Sihdul Ansari R/o Village- Pipra Parsai Tol Ram Nagar, Ward No. 7 alias Pipar Parsain Tole Ram Nagar, Ward No.-7, P.O.- Pipra Parsai alias Pipra Parsain, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Dist.- Sitamarhi (Bihar) 843330 2.
Najara Khatoon W/o Majibul Ansari R/o Village- Pipra Parsai Tol Ram Nagar, Ward No. 7 alias Pipar Parsain Tole Ram Nagar, Ward No.-7, P.O.- Pipra Parsai alias Pipra Parsain, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Dist.- Sitamarhi (Bihar) 843330 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
The Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi India ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Sonbarsa P.S Case No. 10 of 2024 from the Court of learned Sessions Judge Cum Special Judge NDPS Act Sitamarhi/Competent Jurisdiction registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20 (b) (ii) B NDPS Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 10 kg ganja recovered from the possession of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25100 of 2024(2) dt.08-04-2024 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition. It is also submitted that petitioners are in judicial custody since 08.01.2024.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.
6. In view of the allegation as regard to recovery of the ganja which is more than small quantity and less than commercial quantity, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Hence, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners are hereby rejected. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within six months, if trial is not concluded within the stipulated period petitioners may renew his prayer for bail before the trial court. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T