← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20722/2023bail granted

Md. Hamid @ Md. Hamid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20722 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2017 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

MD. HAMID @ MD. HAMID ANSARI SON OF MD. KHALID ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DILGOURI, P.S. - SULTANGANJ, DISTT. - BHAGALPUR 2.

MD. MURSALIN @ MD. MURSIN @ MD. MURSALIN ANSARI SON OF MD. KHALID ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DILGOURI, P.S. - SULTANGANJ, DISTT. - BHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that on 17.11.2017, three named accused persons including the petitioners suddenly came and assaulted his son with knife and sword.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even injuries were found simple and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20722 of 2023(2) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 police after investigation, submitted final form in favour of the petitioners but the learned Trial Court, deferring with the police report, took cognizance. It is next submitted that since one investigating agency has found the petitioner to be innocent, as such, the privilege of anticipatory bail be extended to the petitioners.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 386 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T