Rohit Ranjan v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4026 of 2015 ====================================================== Rohit Ranjan, son of Raja Nand Paswan, resident of village- Lahbanganj, P.S. - Simraha, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The J.K. Trust Gram Vikash Yojana, House no. 5D/21, Near Bhagwantkunj Apartment, North S.K. Puri, Boring Road, Patna- 13 through its Incharge.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 :

Mr. Awadesh Kumar Pandey, SCGC Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC For the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3: Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, AAG-13 Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Awadesh Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 1. Heard also Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, learned Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

After some arguments, Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

Patna High Court CWJC No.4026 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U