Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55044 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -526 Year- 2018 Thana -AGAMKUAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Rohit Kumar, Son of Balmiki Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Nirpur, P.S.- Bind, District- Nalanda presently residing of Ram Pyari Kunj R.M.S. Colony, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh @ Sanjay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner prays for bail in connection with Agam Kuan P.S.Case No. 526 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 356, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of snatching of mobile phone and he was arrested at the spot.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no criminal antecedent and has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 26.8.2018 and he has to fill up form of Intermediate Examination.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55044 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Patna City, in connection with Agam Kuan P.S.Case No. 526 of 2018, G.R.No. 3784 of 2018, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be a family member of the petitioner having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and further condition is that he has to co-operate in disposal of trial and appear before the court as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T