Triloki Chaudhary @ Triloki Pasi @ Raju Pasi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28907 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2017 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== TRILOKI CHAUDHARY @ TRILOKI PASI @ RAJU PASI S/o Bade Pasi R/o village- Chandauli, P.S.- Andar, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Mujibur Rahmanh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 272, 273 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30, 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, registered in connection with Raghunathpur P.S.Case No. 197 of 2017.
Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 makes an explicit embargo on entertaining the application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28907 of 2021(2) dt.29-01-2022 2/2 Since the provision of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is not applicable in respect of offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, as such, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.
If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the court below, the court below shall consider the same on its own merit.
Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T