Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32943/2016bail granted

Md. Kaushar @ Md. Kausar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32943 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2015 Thana -PIPRAKOTHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Md. Kaushar @ Md. Kausar Son of Jatullah Ansari Resident of VillageKuawa, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nut, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 01.01.2016 in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 166 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as in fact the petitioner was a victim of rash driving by the informant. It is submitted that no recovery of any arms or weapons was made from the conscious possession of the petitioner to connect him to the offence alleged.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32943 of 2016 (2) dt.22-08-2016 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motiharii (East Champaran) in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 166 of 2015 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T