← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57138/2017rejected

Shri Bhagwan Singh @ Bhagwan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-29Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57138 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2016 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Shri Bhagwan Singh @ Bhagwan Singh, son of Late Ramdhari Singh, resident of village :- Bishunlura , ( Bishunpura) Police Station : Nokha, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Om Prakash Pandey, Advocate Sri Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Heard Sri Om Prakash Pandey, learned counsel , assisted by Sri Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

It is peculiar case in which only on 15.09.2017 considering the seriousness of the accusation as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner, his prayer for bail was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 41470 of 2017 and within such a short period the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to persuade the Court that after rejection of prayer for bail of the petitioner some of the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail.

The Court is of the opinion that since prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57138 of 2017(2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 petitioner was rejected only on 15.09.2017 , there is no reason to entertain the prayer for bail. Normally, once prayer for bail is rejected by this Court, before expiry of at least six months this Court is not at all entertaining any petition for bail. Moreover , in the present case while rejecting prayer for bail criminal antecedent of the petitioner was noticed and as such, even on this ground, there is no reason to review my earlier order. The prayer for bail again stands rejected. (Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T