Patna High CourtMJC/3891/2014disposed

Maheshwari Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-16Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3891 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1911 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Maheshwari Devi wife of Late Ram Yash Ram, Resident of Village + P.O Bhadwar, P.S Chandi, District- Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Revenue and Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar namely Sri Viyas Jee.

2. The Commissioner & Secretary, Revenue & Land Reforms Department, govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Viyas Jee.

3. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna namely Smt. Vijay Laxmi.

4. The District Magistrate, Buxar namely Dr. Raman Kumar.

5. The Additional Collector, Buxar namely Sri Ajay Kumar

6. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Department, Buxar namely Sri Ajay Kumar.

7. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Buxar namely Sri Awadhesh Kumar.

8. The Block Development Officer, Raipur District- Buxar namely Sri Moti kumar Dinkar.

9. The Treasury Officer, Buxar namely Sri Tukar Paswan,

10. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna namely Sri Sanjay Kumar.

11. The Provident Fund Officer, Bhojpur at Ara namely Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad Bharti For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-09-2015 Reply to the show cause is filed.

The representation of the petitioner has already been disposed of by the concerned authority but the grievance of the petitioner is that up till now, the entire payment of the petitioner has not been made by the concerned authority. In view of the aforesaid facts, this contempt petition

Patna High Court MJC No.3891 of 2014 (5) dt.16-09-2015 2/2 stands disposed of giving liberty to petitioner that if she is not satisfied with the findings given by the concerned authority in disposal of representation of the petitioner, the petitioner may take legal recourse before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U