← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6434/2019disposed

Mother Taresa Mahila Swaym Sahayta Samooh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-06Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6434 of 2019 ====================================================== Mother Taresa Mahila Swaym Sahayta Samooh through Secretary Reena Devi @ Rina Devi, aged about 30 year, Female, Wife of Vishwanath Yadav, Resident of Village- Chandpur, P.O.- Hasanpur Gurda, Via- Mahnar, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patory, District- Samastipur. 4.

The District Supply Officer, Samastipur.

5.

The Block Supply Officer, Patory, District- Samastipur. 6.

Suresh Prasad Rai, Son of Late Deo Narayan Rai, Resident of Village and P.O.- Hetanpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) Date : 06-02-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner/Mother Taresa Mahila Swaym Sahayta Samooh, through its Secretary, has challenged the grant of license to private respondent No. 6 on the ground that the District Selection Committee

Patna High Court CWJC No.6434 of 2019 dt.06-02-2023 2/3 ought to have considered the claim of the institutional license for the petitioner in view of the provisions contained in Rule 8 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, which mandates that except the compassionate ground cases, self-help groups shall be given priority in allotment of fair price shops.

3. In view of the nature of controversy raised and in view of the notification dated 21.07.2022 issued by the Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Sections 3 and 5 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Clause 36 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, we direct that in the event of the petitioner making a suitable representation/complaint before the concerned Divisional Commissioner within a period of 15 days, he shall look into the matter and after giving hearing to all the stake-holders including private respondent No. 6, shall pass a final order within a further period of 60 days

Patna High Court CWJC No.6434 of 2019 dt.06-02-2023 3/3 thereafter, giving reasons in support of the decision taken by him.

4. The order so passed by the Divisional Commissioner shall be made available to the petitioner as well as private respondent No. 6 forthwith.

5. We have specifically asked for the private respondent No. 6 to be heard by the Divisional Commissioner as the present order is being passed in his absence.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) (Satyavrat Verma, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 07.02.2023 Transmission Date N/A