Nabi Rashul Khan @ Nathuni Khan @ Nathuni Mian v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56576 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3087 Year-2004 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== Nabi Rashul Khan @ Nathuni Khan @ Nathuni Mian, Son of Late Hamshad Khan, Resident of Village Nagra, P.S. Nagra, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Most. Jamila Khatoon, Wife of Late Shaheb Hussain Khan, Resident of Village- Mashrakh, P.S. Mashrakh, District- Saran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Akhileshwar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 3087 of 2004 (Tr. No. 1768 of 2018) registered for offences under sections 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
An allegation has been made is the nature of civil dispute. The petitioner is a 70 years old person. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Nabi Rashul Khan @ Nathuni Khan @ Nathuni Mian, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56576 of 2018(2) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Complaint Case No. 3087 of 2004 (Tr. No. 1768 of 2018), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T