Manoj Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29201 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2020 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

MANOJ CHAUDHARY S/O RAM CHANDRA CHAUDHARY R/o village- Hamidpur, Kurji, near at Sadakat Ashram, P.S.- Digha, Distt.- Patna, at present tenant in the house of Brahmdeo Singh Near at Murgi Darwa Biscuit Factory More, Nasariganj, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna 2.

POONAM DEVI W/O SRI MANOJ CHOUDHARY R/o village- Hamidpur, Kurji, near at Sadakat Ashram, P.S.- Digha, Distt.- Patna, at present tenant in the house of Brahmdeo Singh Near at Murgi Darwa Biscuit Factory More, Nasariganj, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna 3.

BABLOO KUMAR @ SUNNY KUMAR S/O SRI MANOJ CHOUDHARY R/o village- Hamidpur, Kurji, near at Sadakat Ashram, P.S.- Digha, Distt.- Patna, at present tenant in the house of Brahmdeo Singh Near at Murgi Darwa Biscuit Factory More, Nasariganj, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, Advocate ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 & 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29201 of 2021(3) dt.07-02-2022 2/2 The accusation against these petitioners is that they have extended their co-operation in kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The daughter of the informant was not recovered from the house of the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mehandiganj P.S. Case No.177 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T