← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18016/2020bail granted

Deo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-10Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18016 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2019 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== DEO KUMAR S/o Ashok Singh R/o village- Sachai, P.S.- Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that the girl was recovered and in her statement recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C has stated that she had had gone to Delhi on her own volition. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18016 of 2020(2) dt.10-06-2020 2/2 25.11.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U