Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19621/2022bail granted

Prakash Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-11Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19621 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== PRAKASH KUMAR MEHTA, SON OF UPENDRA MEHTA, R/O VILLAGE- NAYA TOLA, DAULATPUR, P.S.- RAGHOPUR, DISTRICTSUPAUL ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one misfire cartridge from the possession of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 06.01.2022.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19621 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 08/2022 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T