Md. Anzar @ Md. Anzar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55861 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55861 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -157 Year- 2018 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Md. Anzar @ Md. Anzar Ansari, Son of Md. Mustkim, Resident of VillageKyotapatti, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 447, 448, 379, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 157 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated with the allegation of assault with lathi in the informant's head. There is case and counter case between the parties. The injury is simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55861 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 157 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T