Guddu Singh @ Ranjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3336 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Guddu Singh @ Ranjay Singh, Son of Gopal Singh, Resident of Village- Basat Pur, P.S. Muffasil, Motihari, District- East Champaran. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Mufasil Police Station Case No.106 of 2016 registered under Sections 325/307/302 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
It appears that similarly situated some other co-accused Narendra Singh has already been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 625 of 2016 vide
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3336 of 2017 (3) dt.21-12-2017 P2/ Annexure-2 series.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Muffasil Police Station Case No.106 of 2016, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T