Ramu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20672 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2017 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== Ramu Yadav, S/o Late Karamlal Yadav Resident of Chandra Vihar Colony, Ashiyana Nagar, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, Distt- Patna, Permanent of Resident of Village- Zarsain, P.O. Nandlali, P.S.- Saharsa, Distt- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Registrar General, Honble Patna High Court, Patna. Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mrs.Anita Kumari Singh, APP For the High Court :
Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Patna High Court.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.464 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 181, 193, 468, 471 and 120 (B)of the Indian Penal Code. The present case has arisen on account of a wrong affidavit, which has been sworn in Cr. Misc. No.2084 of 2014. This Court has directed to hold an enquiry with respect to swearing of false affidavit and, on that basis, an enquiry was conducted by the then Registrar General, who has found that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20672 of 2020(4) dt.17-12-2020 2/2 petitioner has made a false affidavit. Thereafter, on that count, this case has been lodged.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no suppression of fact or false affidavit has been made, but the order along with the enquiry report reflects that the false affidavit has been made.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within four weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the Court below will consider the same and pass appropriate order without being influenced by the order of this Court. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T