Ramjeevan Singh @ Sudarshan Singh @ Sudarshan @ Ramjivan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19840 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2020 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramjeevan Singh @ Sudarshan Singh @ Sudarshan @ Ramjivan Sharma Son Of Late Udhabh Singh R/O Village- Siswar, P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the U.A.P. Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused persons were found in suspicious condition and on search, a white plastic bag containing 25 pieces explosive substance has been recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Nothing incriminating article

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19840 of 2022(6) dt.19-01-2024 2/2 has been recovered from his conscious possession rather the alleged recovery was made from the co-accused namely, Jitendra Kumar, which is evident from the F.I.R. itself. He has been made accused in this case merely on suspicion. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 22.11.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25850 of 2021. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.10.2020.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Gaya in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 302 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T