Patna High CourtCWJC/408/2014dismissed

Rekha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.408 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Rekha Kumari W/O Binay Kumar Singh Resident Of Village- Parsahi, P.OEkhari, P.S- Ladania, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, I.C.D.S. (Social Welfare Department), Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

5. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

6. The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

7. The Child Development Project Officer, Ladania, P.S- Ladania, DistrictMadhubani.

8. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Ekhari, P.S- Ladania, District- Madhubani.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Ekhari, P.S- Ladania, DistrictMadhubani.

10. Palas Kumar W/O Singheshwar Singh Resident Of Village- Parsahi, P.OSidhap, P.S- Ladania, District- Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Syed Arshad Alam, SC 3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-03-2015 The concurrent finding of facts are there by the District Magistrate as well as the Divisional Commissioner about the way things have been manipulated by the Mukhiya in favour of the petitioner to accommodate her as an Aanganbari Sevika. The finding being what they are, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the decision. The plea of the petitioner that the private respondent was not an applicant is a plea taken at the High Court level and there is

Patna High Court CWJC No.408 of 2014 dt.10-03-2015 2/2 nothing in the orders to indicate that such a position was even taken before the forums below. Even this stand does not assist the petitioner in overcoming the two impugned orders. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U