← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32924/2016rejected

Shila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32924 of 2016 (2) dt.24-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32924 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2015 Thana -BELCHHI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Shila Devi Wife of Late Binod Raut Resident of Jodhan Bigha, P.S.- Belchhi, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y. C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2016 Heard learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew her prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 08.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 754 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2015 and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded, the petitioner is a lady, there is no specific allegation against her rather allegation is against her and her son Vishal Raut for assaulting the deceased. No post mortem was done and in death certificate issued by Maa Tara Hospital the cause of death was cardiac respiratory arrest and only one head injury though that was grievous in nature was found on the person of the deceased.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32924 of 2016 (2) dt.24-08-2016 submitting that the petitioner gave fatal blow on the head of her husband.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again her prayer for bail stands rejected. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which, if the petitioner at no fault, may renew her prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T