Bhairon Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20431 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2021 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== BHAIRON YADAV Son of Late Kailu Yadav Resident of Piparadeeh, Police Station - Katoria, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2021, he has got antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 25.09.2021 at 8:00 pm, while he was going to Pipradeeh from his house, all of a sudden from behind an attempt was made to kill him by a bomb, it is next alleged that the bomb was thrown but the same did not explode but hit him on account of which he received jolt, it is further alleged that out of the six accused persons, he identified Anup and Bhairon Yadav (petitioner).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20431 of 2022(3) dt.06-01-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted at best the allegation is that a bomb was thrown but did not explode as such the informant did not receive any injury, it is also submitted that there is a land dispute between the parties as the informant is trying to forcefully usurp the land of the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 256 of 2021.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T