Sikendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19575 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== SIKENDRA MANDAL Son of Late Harinarayan Mandal Resident of VillageKarharwa Ward No. 8, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 325,307, 504, 379, 427 IPC registered in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with ongoing land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation of assault attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018., subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19575 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T