Raunak Kumar @ Lav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41453 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2014 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Raunak Kumar @ Lav Kumar, Son of Satendra Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Karma Road, Opposite Bijali Office, P.S. - Town Aurangabad, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2015 Heard.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 380/457 of the Indian Penal Code in which subsequently offence under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR vide Annexure-1 as an accused and he has been arraigned as an accused in the present case on the basis of the confessional statement of a co-accused recorded by the police, and further taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is said to be a student, this Court is inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41453 of 2014 (2) dt.20-03-2015 satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and subject to further conditions that:

(A) Both the bailors shall be only the parents of the petitioner, (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned;

(C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U T