Patna High CourtMJC/2117/2015disposed

Chandrika Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-07Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2117 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14567 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Chandrika Devi Wife of Late Ram Krishna Prasad Singh R/o Village Gopal Band, P.S. Sarmera, District Nalan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri R.D. Ranjan, The Director Health Service, Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General A&G II, Bihar, Patna

4. The State of Jharkhand

5. Dr. Praveen Chandra, The Director, Health Service, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi

6. Sri Manish Sahya, The Accountant General (A&G) Jharkhand, Ranchi

7. Smt. Rani Besra, The First Medical Officer, Sadar Prakhand Godda, District Godda (Jharkhand) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anant Pd. Singh, SC 15 Mr. Hemant Pd. Singh, AC to SC 15 For the State of Jharkhand: Mr. Sanjiv Jaiswal, Advocate For the Accountant General: Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 07-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna as well as learned counsel representing State of Jharkhand.

Petitioner has submitted that PPO has been opened in her name and on account thereof, the direction having been given at an earlier occasion vide order dated 28.06.2016 is found complied with. In a casual manner, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that family pension has been fixed less than the amount for whatever she is entitled to and further failed to

Patna High Court MJC No.2117 of 2015 (6) dt.07-09-2016 disclose in detail.

Because of the fact that the order impugned has already been complied with, pendency of instant petition will give no fruitful result, whereupon, the same is dropped. Petitioner, in case, is found aggrieved with the quantum of the family pension having so fixed, may take proper legal recourse as provide under law.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) perwez U