Rajesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18031 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2016 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajesh Ranjan Son of Indraraman Pandey Resident of Village - Wazirganj, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498(A)/494/420 of the I.P.C.

Nobody appears on behalf of O.P. No.2, despite validly served notice.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is husband of the victim and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with dignity and honour. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as undertaking of petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18031 of 2019(5) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 306 of 2016, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) S.Katyayan/- U T