Punam Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21232 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- MAHESI District- East Champaran ======================================================
1) PUNAM DEVI (M), W/O Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Munna @ Shashi Bhushan Prasad resident of Village: Kankatti, P.S.: Mehsi, District: East Champaran
2) Niraj Kumar @ Ravi Bhushan Kumar (M) S/O Ramakant Bhagat @Ramakant Prasad resident of Village: Kankatti, P.S.: Mehsi, District: East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land Ramakant assaulted informant by lathi, Shashi assaulted by farsa causing injury on head, Neeraj and his family members assaulted by lathi, thereafter, Suraj, Subhash, Poonam and wife of Ramakant also assaulted, it is next alleged that Neeraj further assaulted Motilal by dab causing cut injuries on his head and Suraj and Subhash
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 21232 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 2/3 assaulted Vickey and Dharmendra by sharp edged weapon who came to save.
Learned submits for the petitioners that petitioner are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner No. 1 is a woman and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail then the allegation against petitioner No. 2 is of assaulting Motilal by dab but from perusal of the injury report it would manifest that the injuries suffered by Motilal is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated which amply demonstrates that petitioner no. 2 had no intention of committing a serious offence. Learned counsel next submits that as far as petitioner no. 1 is alleged the allegation against her is general and omnibus in nature.
Shri Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 21232 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 3/3 on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No. 133 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T