Shrawan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22367 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-416 Year-2022 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== Shrawan Paswan Son of Suresh Paswan Resident of Deora Takiya, P.S. - Konch, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 416 of 2022, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 307, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the informant armed with various weapons and assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22367 of 2025(3) dt.24-07-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and due to some previous land disputes, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 416 of 2022.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T