Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21905/2026bail rejected

Pramod Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21905 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-547 Year-2025 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Pramod Sah S/o Late Jiut sah @ Late Jiuta Sah R/o Vill- Ajgarwa, P.s.- Pakridayal, Distt- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.547 of 2025 lodged on 06.12.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons including the petitioner with allegation that they have killed the son of the informant and hanged the dead body on a mango tree.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21905 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 present case. He further submits that there is no eye-witness of the said incident. He further submits that upon bare reading of the FIR, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.

5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there is one criminal case pending against him. He also submits that the cause of death is Asphyxia due to hanging.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and allegation is also made against him.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T