Dhananjay Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1020 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ======================================================

1. Dhananjay Mahto, Son of Harihar Mahto,

2. Ramlakhan Mahto, Son of Mohan Mahto, Both Residents of Village- Nonia Dih Madhuban, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This is an application for regular bail in connection with Madhuban P. S. Case no. 187 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant is the son of the deceased and FIR has been lodged against unknown. However, during investigation on the basis of statement of co-accused Raj Kishsore Sahani the houses of Dhananjay Mahto and Ramlakhan Mahto were searched and blood-stained paint was recovered from the house of Ramlakhan Mahto. However, against Dhananjay Mahto except confession, there is no incriminating material against him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let above named petitioner no. 1 , namely, Dhananjahy Mahto, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1020 of 2018(3) dt.02-02-2018 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Motihari at East Champaran, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case no. 187 of 2017. So far as petitioner no. 2, Ramlakhan Mahto, is concerned, his prayer for bail is rejected.

(S. Kumar, J) sudip/- U T