← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20023/2022disposed

Narsingh Noniya @ Narsingh Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20023 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-475 Year-2021 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Narsingh Noniya @ Narsingh Chouhan Son Of Rajvanshi Chouhan Resident Of Rupi Bagahi, P.S.- Kateya, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 37(C) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

There is recovery of 11.20 litres of country made liquor. The petitioner is alleged to have fled away from the place of seizure.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. Nothing was recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20023 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/2 possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized illicit liquor. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner is accused in five other cases apart from the present one. Considering the fact that petitioner is accused in five other cases apart from the present one, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before learned Court below and pray for regular bail. The learned Court below may consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, keeping in view the facts discussed above and without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T