Arun Kumar @ Jitu Yadav @ Jitu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19400 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- PARWALPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Arun Kumar @ Jitu Yadav @ Jitu Kumar Son of Amirak Yadav Resident of Village- Ladhuari, P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 16.01.2026, in connection with Parwalpur P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 30.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(1), 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he gave farsha blow on the head of the father of the informant due to which he sustained head injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence had taken

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19400 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 2/3 place and there is case and counter case between the parties. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner is that he gave farsha blow on the head of the father of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no intention to kill anyone and due to spur of moment the present occurrence had taken place and the petitioner is in custody since 16.01.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner and apart from aforesaid the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, V, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Parwalpur P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19400 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T