← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/301/2020disposed

Putun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-16Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh,Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.301 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Putun Yadav, Son of Garib Yadav, Resident of Village - Lakho Chak, P.S.- Chanan, Distt - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Inspector General, Prison, Bihar, Patna 5.

The Jail Superintendent, Mandal Kara, Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH) 16-11-2021 At the outset, it is submitted by Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the application the petitioner has been set at liberty. He submitted that in view of the subsequent development the instant application filed in the nature of habeas corpus has become infructuous. However, he contended that the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek other remedies available in law to the petitioner for the redressal of his grievance in respect of his illegal confinement. Learned counsel for the State raises no objection to

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.301 of 2020(2) dt.16-11-2021 2/2 such prayer of the petitioner.

In view of the submission made at the Bar, the application is dismissed as infructuous with liberty aforesaid. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sanjeet/RajeevU