Patna High CourtCWJC/11466/2015dismissed

A. K. Gopalan Shaikshik Society v. The Bihar School Examination Board Senior Secondary Patna And ORS

2016-03-08Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11466 of 2015 =========================================================== A. K. Gopalan Shaikshik Society, A.K. Gopalan College, Sultanganj, Bhagalpur, through its Secretary namely Prof Arjun Prasad (Rtd.) S/o Lt D.N. Yadav R/o Mohalla - Sri Krishna Nagar, P.O. & P.S. - Ishakchak, Town & District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Bihar School Examination Board ( Senior Secondary ) Patna through its Secretary.

2. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary) Patna.

3. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Director, Secondary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. P.K. Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. D.K. Prasad, G.P.7 For the Board :

Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate For Intervenor :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. D.K. Gupta, Advocate Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-03-2016 Writ application is dismissed for the simple ground that nobody can claim or challenge the decision of the Examination Board without complying and fulfilling the requirements under law and statute which has been put in place in terms of the amendment brought about in the year 2011. Annexure-7 is a press communication meant for all such institutions which have not fallen in line and put the management in place in terms of the requirement of Rule 17 of the amended Rule of 2013.

Writ application is required to be dismissed. The ball is

Patna High Court CWJC No.11466 of 2015 dt.08-03-2016 2 / 2 in the court of the petitioner if he so wants. Even otherwise, Annexure-7 is an interim arrangement in place and not a final decision.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U