Surendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19250 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Surendra Singh Son of Gorakh Singh Resident of village- Dhondhanadih, P.S.- Kachhawan, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashikant For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner came, thereafter Bipin and Vikky tried snatching Rs. 5,000/- from the informant and were also carrying gun, further on orders of Gorakh, petitioner assaulted the informant by gandasa causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant alleges that on orders of Gorakh, the petitioner assaulted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19250 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 him by gandasa causing injury on head. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow was not repeated and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kachhwa P.S. Case No. 59 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T