Shweta Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19948 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1195 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== SHWETA SINGH D/o- Rajeshwar Singh Proprietor of M/s Shweta Bharat Gas Gramin Vitrak, P.O.- Isuapur, P.S. - Ishauapur Chapra, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Vishal Raj Son of Mr. Alok Kumar Singh Prop. of M/s Raj Traders Pirmohani Chowk (Near New Jaipur Hotel) Chura Mill Lane P.O. and P.S. - Kadamkuan, Dist. - Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1195(c) of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, complainant happens to be the proprietor of M/s Raj Traders and petitioner happens to be the Properietor of M/s Shwetra Bharat Gas Gramin Vitrak. It is alleged that in March, 2016 complainant had supplied total 2016 pieces fire extinguishers to the accused-petitioner on credit amounting to Rs. 9,07,200/- but till date in spite of legal notice, petitioner has not clear her dues.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19948 of 2022(4) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to business rivalry. She has got no criminal antecedent. The matter relates to civil dispute.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 1195 (c) of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T