Surjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18231 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
SURJEET YADAV Son of Deo Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Karhatta, P.s.- Paraiya, Distt.- Gaya.
2.
Satendra Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav @ Samar Yadav Son of Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village - Daulatpur, P.S.- Konch and Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 63 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 386, 387, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
The allegation is regarding the accused persons having engaged in collecting levy from the informant and when the police had come at the spot, on the information given by the informant, some miscreants were arrested while some had fled away and upon inquiry being made from the arrested persons, the arrested
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18231 of 2019(2) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 miscreants had disclosed the name of the petitioners as the persons who had fled away.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that no incriminating articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent and they are languishing in custody since 12.12.2018.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioners on regular bail.
Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VIth, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 63 of 2018.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T