Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2171/2018bail granted

Domarlal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-16Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2171 of 2018 (2) dt.16-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2171 of 2018 Special Case No. 24 of 2017 arising Out of PS.Case No. -227 Year- 2017 Thana -KURSAKANTA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Domarlal Sah .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2017 in connection with Special Case No. 24 of 2017, corresponding to Kursakanta (Kuwari) P.S. Case No. 227 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 20, 22 and 24 of the NDPS Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged recovery of 800 grams of ganja from the possession of the petitioner, which is denied. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with Special Case No. 24 of 2017, corresponding to Kursakanta (Kuwari) P.S. Case No. 227 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2171 of 2018 (2) dt.16-01-2018 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T