Babita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29454 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2017 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== 1.

BABITA DEVI, wife of Binod Bhagat, Resident of Village Aadhar Pur @ Chak Nizamat, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, District - Samastipur. 2.

Binod Bhagat, Son of Yugeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village Aadhar Pur @ Chak Nizamat, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, District - Samastipur. 3.

Ram Ekbal Bhagat, Son of Yugeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village Aadhar Pur @ Chak Nizamat, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, District - Samastipur. 4.

Satish Bhagat, Son of Yugeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village Aadhar Pur @ Chak Nizamat, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, District - Samastipur. 5.

Raghuwansh Bhagat, Son of Yugeshwar Bhagat, Resident of Village Aadhar Pur @ Chak Nizamat, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 223 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 363/365/366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29454 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 wants to withdraw the bail application.

Prayer is allowed. The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn.

In case, the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the court below will consider the petition for regular bail of the petitioners without being prejudiced by the fact that anticipatory bail petition has been rejected by this Court. (Sandeep Kumar, J) uday/- U T