Kewal Krishna v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5453 of 2022 ====================================================== Kewal Krishna Son of Ajay Singh Resident of Village- Vangra, P.O.- Rajapatti, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Special Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

4.

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

5.

The District Program Officer (Establishment), Education Department, Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, SC16 :

Mr. Madhukar Mishra, AC to SC16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

"i. For issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to consider petitioner's application dated 27.08.2021 and thereby be pleased to grant him 5% relaxation in the marks of CTET as the petitioner fall under the category of EWS (Economically weaker section) and the candidates of other reserved category have been given 5% relaxation in the marks of the СТЕТ.. ii. The petitioner further prays that the respondent authorities be directed to not to terminate him without giving 5% relaxation in the total marks of CTET.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5453 of 2022(5) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 iii. Any other relief or reliefs / interim relief as your lordship may deem fit and proper."

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the concerned Authority, but till date the said representation has not been disposed of.

4. Considering the above-mentioned fact, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the Respondent No.2 along with all supporting documents within a period of two weeks and the Respondent No.2 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within one months thereafter.

5. It is made clear that the Respondent No.2 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U