Binay Chandra Ghosh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1034 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.841 of 2017 ====================================================== Binay Chandra Ghosh Son of Late Parmeshwar Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Poari, Post Office- Khari Banka, Police Station- Bisfi, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sri Chanchal Kumar, Principal Secretary, B.C.D. Patna.
2.
Vinay Kumar, The Secretary, Bihar Public Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Rajiv Ranjan Prasad Singh, The Director (Secondary Education) Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Sri Anil Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Work Division-2, Benipatti, Sivir Rahika, District- Madhubani Bihar. 5.
Sri Rajesh Kumar Sinha, The District Programme Officer (Scheme and account) Madhubani Bihar.
6.
Sri Sanjay Kumar, The District Education Officer, Madhubani, Bihar. 7.
Madan Choudhary, The Junior Engineer Rural Work Department Work Division, Benipatti, District- Madhubani.
8.
Smt. Saroj Kumari, The Headmaster Vidyapati plus2 High School Bisfi, Madhubani.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kedar Jha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Amit Prakash, GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
"for initiation of contempt proceedings against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience and deliberate non-
Patna High Court MJC No.1034 of 2019(5) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 compliance of the order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Court in CWJC No. 841 of 2017."
3. The show cause shows that against the claim of Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs), Rs.7,35,090/- (Seven Lakhs Thirty Five Thousand and Ninety) has been paid.
4. If the petitioner still has grievance, can take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
5. Having convinced that the order stands complied, the MJC No. 1034 of 2019 is disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U