Abhinav Singh @ Abhinav Yadav @ Vivek Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19509 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1360 Year-2015 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Abhinav Singh @ Abhinav Yadav @ Vivek Yadav S/o Sri Rajaram Singh R/o vill - Indrahia, P.S.- Sasaram, (Muffasil), Distt.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sasaram Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1360 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he along with Vivek Singh and Kapil Singh opened indiscriminate firing on Uday Singh, who suffered fire-arm injury. It has also been mentioned in the F.I.R. that the accused persons did not stop firing until death of the deceased.

4. While making prayer for bail, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the others co-accused persons on similar footing have been granted bail but the bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19509 of 2025(2) dt.09-05-2025 2/2 application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 23.07.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 2279 of 2024 because he remained absconded and the charges have been framed in the year 2024. Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner has remained under custody for two years and he has been punished for his default.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the case was registered in the year 2015 and due to absconding of the petitioner, the trial has hampered for a considerable long duration.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1360 of 2015, subject to the following condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Neha/- U T