← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29624/2021bail granted

Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29624 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1230 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SATYENDRA YADAV Son of Ramchandra Yadav Resident of Village - Laxman Bigha, P.S.- Madanpur, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Excise Case No. 1230 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section-30(a)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 25 liters spirit and 30 kg. wrapper is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29624 of 2021(2) dt.10-08-2021 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 25 liters spirit and 30 kg. wrapper is recovered from a bamboo hut adjacent to goat farm belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Aurangabad in connection with Excise Case No. 1230 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29624 of 2021(2) dt.10-08-2021 3/3 furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T