← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6954/2020disposed

Shail Kumar Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6954 of 2020 ====================================================== Shail Kumar Devi Wife of Late Sitaram Choudhari, Resident of Village and Police Station-Dalsingh Sarai, District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

3.

The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4.

The Principal, R.B. College, Dalsingh Sarai, P.S.-Dalsingh Sarai, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No.2, Adv.

For the State :

Ms.Abhanjalli, Adv.

For the University :

Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the University. 2.

The present writ application has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities particularly respondent no.3 to pay the due salary pursuant to the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. as well as the arrear of differences of salary with respect to the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. of petitioner's late husband namely Sitaram Choudhari to the petitioner.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed a representation before the Registrar

Patna High Court CWJC No.6954 of 2020(3) dt.07-10-2024 2/2 of Lalit Narayan Mithila University (respondent no.3) but till date, no order has been passed.

4.

Considering this fact, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3 within a period of three weeks and after receipt of the said representation, the respondent no.3 is well advised to dispose off the same, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter. 5.

It is made clear that, if the petitioner is found entitled for the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. as well as the arrears of difference of salary with respect to the A.C.P. and M.A.C.P. of her late husband, the same shall be paid to her, within a further period of two weeks.

6.

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U